Talking Stick Model to Increase Student Learning Activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69693/jeca.v1i2.15Keywords:
Talking Stick, Student Learning, Student Activity, Academic PredictionAbstract
Stick learning models speak using stick media. After students can learn the main topic, students who carry sticks are responsible for answering the teacher's questions. This learning method is designed to find out how far students understand the material being taught. When a teacher does not involve students in the learning process actively, students do not get the opportunity to ask questions or give opinions. In addition, the use of minimal media in learning causes the learning process to be less effective. The method implemented by the teacher is less creative, which causes students to feel bored, and the teacher is unable to present the lesson in an interesting way. This study uses a qualitative approach with library analysis. The Talking Stick model helps the learning of students and makes them more active, responsible, confident, and independent. It also makes learning more interactive and easier to use by the teacher. Teachers and students who use this learning model can get a lot of developments and advantages in learning, but some students can still listen, but they are less able to show their speaking skills when their turn arrives.
Downloads
References
P. Alscher, U. Ludewig, and N. McElvany, “Civic Education, Teaching Quality and Students’ Willingness to Participate in Political and Civic Life: Political Interest and Knowledge as Mediators,” J. Youth Adolesc., vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1886–1900, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01639-9.
C. L. Hsu, J. C. Teets, R. Hasmath, J. Y. J. Hsu, and T. Hildebrandt, “The Construction and Performance of Citizenship in Contemporary China,” J. Contemp. China, vol. 31, no. 138, pp. 827–843, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1080/10670564.2022.2030993.
B. Vajen, S. Kenner, and F. Reichert, “Digital citizenship education – Teachers’ perspectives and practices in Germany and Hong Kong,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 122, p. 103972, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2022.103972.
A. Saldıray and A. Doğanay, “An action research to develop critical thinking skills in the context of citizenship education in higher education,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 53, p. 101584, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101584.
M. Rosa, D. C. Orey, and A. P. S. de Sousa Mesquita, “An ethnomodelling perspective for the development of a citizenship education,” ZDM – Math. Educ., vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 953–965, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11858-023-01472-9.
E. Ryen and E. Jøsok, “Citizenship-as-knowledge: How perspectives from Bildung-centred Didaktik can contribute to European Citizenship Education beyond competence,” Eur. Educ. Res. J., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 39–57, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/14749041211045777.
L. De Schaepmeester, J. van Braak, and K. Aesaert, “Teach what you preach? The relationship between teachers’ citizenship beliefs and citizenship education in the classroom,” J. Soc. Stud. Res., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 363–378, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jssr.2021.10.001.
A. C. Weinschenk and C. T. Dawes, “Civic Education in High School and Voter Turnout in Adulthood,” Br. J. Polit. Sci., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 934–948, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1017/S0007123420000435.
T. Harrison and G. Polizzi, “(In)civility and adolescents’ moral decision making online: drawing on moral theory to advance digital citizenship education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 3277–3297, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10710-0.
A. Zuurmond, L. Guérin, P. van der Ploeg, and D. van Riet, “Learning to question the status quo. Critical thinking, citizenship education and Bildung in vocational education,” J. Vocat. Educ. Train., vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 1185–1204, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1080/13636820.2023.2166573.
H. Oe, Y. Yamaoka, and H. Ochiai, “A Qualitative Assessment of Community Learning Initiatives for Environmental Awareness and Behaviour Change: Applying UNESCO Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Framework,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 6, p. 3528, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063528.
E. Bosio, “Global citizenship education as a reflexive dialogic pedagogy,” Citizsh. Teach. Learn., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 177–194, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1386/ctl_00119_1.
M. Y. Worku, “Examining the instructional process of citizenship education in Ethiopia: The case of secondary schools in the Amhara state,” Educ. Citizsh. Soc. Justice, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1177/17461979241274773.
Sarkadi, A. R. Casmana, C. J. Hisyam, and I. Wardatussa’idah, “Integrating Character Education Into the RECE Learning Model Through Pancasila and Citizenship Education Subjects,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.841037.
L. Jerome, F. Hyder, Y. Hilal, and B. Kisby, “A systematic literature review of research examining the impact of citizenship education on active citizenship outcomes,” Rev. Educ., vol. 12, no. 2, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1002/rev3.3472.
H.-C. Kuo, T.-L. Weng, C.-C. Chang, and C.-Y. Chang, “Designing Our Own Board Games in the Playful Space: Improving High School Student’s Citizenship Competencies and Creativity through Game-Based Learning,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 2968, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15042968.
M. G. Martín, “University professional and citizenship education through service learning,” Int. J. Intellect. Prop. Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 148, 2022, doi: 10.1504/IJIPM.2022.120994.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Computer Applications
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
