Comparison Between State and Private University Student of Adversity Quotient on Online Learning

Dina Mardiana; Umiarso Umiarso

doi:10.69693/jeca.v2i2.25

Authors

Dina Mardiana Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Umiarso Umiarso Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69693/jeca.v2i2.25

Keywords:

Adversity quotient, Student performance, Learning autonomy, State university, Private university

Abstract

This study intends to investigate how Adversity Quotient (AQ) or Intelligence in Facing Student Obstacles might be formed through online learning at PTKIs, the Private University in Malang and the Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. The COVID-19 epidemic, which compelled universities to adapt to online learning, caused alterations in learning patterns at PTKI, which served as the foundation for this study. The study aimed to explore the Adversity Quotient among students, focusing on four core dimensions: Control, Ownership, Reach, and Endurance. Additionally, the study examined four dimensions pertinent to online learning: Student Performance, Technology, Lecturer, and Self-Regulation. As a result, it is clear that the responders at the State University of Malang have performed admirably, are able to overcome obstacles, and are able to maximize the potential that rises daily. In contrast to the low scores of University "X" Malang respondents. As long as life proceeds pretty smoothly, the individual is often responsible for navigating it. However, the individual may experience more setbacks or become disheartened by the accumulation of life's difficulties In addition to offering recommendations for the future development of online learning, it is envisaged that this research will give an overview of how online learning at PTKI can affect students' AQ.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Safi’i et al., “The effect of the adversity quotient on student performance, student learning autonomy and student achievement in the COVID-19 pandemic era: evidence from Indonesia,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 12, p. e08510, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08510.

N. N. Duke, “Adolescent Adversity, School Attendance and Academic Achievement: School Connection and the Potential for Mitigating Risk,” J. Sch. Health, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 618–629, 2020, doi: 10.1111/josh.12910.

Titus Ng, “Organizational Resilience and Adversity Quotient of Singapore Companies,” Int. Proc. Econ. Dev. Res., vol. 63, no. 15, pp. 73–77, 2013, doi: 10.7763/IPEDR.

N. Clohessy, L. McKellar, and J. Fleet, “Bounce back- bounce forward: Midwifery students experience of resilience,” Nurse Educ. Pract., vol. 37, no. October 2018, pp. 22–28, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.04.011.

R. A. Ainun, Rosidah, and Hamda, “The Effect of Learning Style, Emotional Intelligence, and Adversity Quotient on the Second-grade Students’ Mathematics Learning Achievement of Islamic Senior High School,” EduLine J. Educ. Learn. Innov., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 88–98, 2022, doi: 10.35877/454ri.eduline746.

F. Kuhon, “A Study on Students’ Adversity Quotient and Academic Performance in English Subject,” J. Adv. English Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 24, 2020, doi: 10.47354/jaes.v3i1.72.

S. Fadhila, M. Mudjiran, and N. Gistituati, “The Contribution of Adversity Quotient to Learning Outcomes of Students in Middle School and the Counseling Services Implication,” J. Educ. Learn. Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 65, 2019, doi: 10.32698/0612.

L. Anne Tansiongco and F. Ibarra, “Educational Leader’s Adversity Quotient, Management Style, and Job Performance: Implications to School Leadership,” Indones. Res. J. Educ. |IRJE|, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 386–401, 2020, doi: 10.22437/irje.v4i2.9264.

Y. B. Hermanto and V. A. Srimulyani, “The Challenges of Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic,” Jurna Pendidik. Dan Pengajaran, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 1, 2021, doi: 10.37762/jgmds.8-2.215.

I. Rukmana, M. Hasbi, and B. Paloloang, “Hubungan adversity quotient dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri Model Terpadu Madani Palu,” J. Elektron. Pendidik. Mat. Tadulako, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 325–333, 2016.

D. Wisesa and K. R. Indrawati, “Hubungan Adversity Quotient Dengan Motivasi Berwirausaha Pada Mahasiswa Universitas Udayana Yang Mengikuti Program Mahasiswa Wirausaha,” J. Psikol. Udayana, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 187–195, 2016, doi: 10.24843/jpu.2016.v03.i02.p02.

D. Mardiana, “Adversity Quotient and the Development of Students ’ Endurance Dimensions in the New Normal Era : A Study of Islamic Religious Education Online Learning at the State University of Malang Islam-PAI ),” vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 19–33, 2022, doi: 10.33367/ji.v12i1.2278.

D. A. Kifta, “Adversity Quotient, Self-Efficacy and Online Learning Tendencies on Students in Hinterland Region,” 8th Int. Conf. Tech. …, vol. 608, no. Ictvet, pp. 60–66, 2021.

L. Sofyana and A. Rozaq, “Pembelajaran Daring Kombinasi Berbasis Whatsapp Pada Kelas Karyawan Prodi Teknik Informatika Universitas Pgri Madiun,” J. Nas. Pendidik. Tek. Inform., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 81, 2019, doi: 10.23887/janapati.v8i1.17204.

M. D. Wicaksono, N. Hairunisya, and N. U. Hadi, “Pembelajaran Daring Dengan Metode Resitasi Dan Pemanfaatan Google Classroom Pada Pembelajaran IPS,” Equilib. J. Ilm. Ekon. dan Pembelajarannya, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 95, 2021, doi: 10.25273/equilibrium.v9i2.10005.

M. Sigala, “Investigating the Factors Determining e-Learning Effectiveness in Tourism and Hospitality Education systems are being designed specifically to support classroom experiences , especially group groups and ‘ chat rooms ’ extend the reach of the classroom bey,” pp. 11-21file:///C:/Users/ggkgg/Documents/Dina Marina/, 2004.

Subarto, D. Solihin, and D. Qurbani, “Determinants of Job Satisfaction and Its Implications for the Lecturers Performance,” vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 163–178, 2021.

Z. Hasan, “Academic sociology: The alarming rise in predatory publishing and its consequences for Islamic economics and finance,” ISRA Int. J. Islam. Financ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6–18, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJIF-11-2017-0044.